2023年，Peer Review Week 的主题为“同行评审与出版的未来（Peer Review and the Future of Publishing）”，活动时间为9月25日至29日。本届活动聚焦快速变革的学术出版环境，涵盖新政策、商业模式、技术进步，以及对透明度和研究可重复性的要求，同时呼吁学术社区思考同行评审在未来出版体系中的作用与发展方向。

其活动汇总如下：
LIVE EVENTS from 2023–for reference

2023 年直播活动（供参考）

18 September 2023--Code check hackathon–hybrid event

2023年9月18日--代码检查黑客松–混合活动

Interested in reproducible code and Open Science? A codecheck is a light-touch independent peer review to check that your code and data can generate the computational results in your paper or project. As part of a pilot project between TU Delft and CODECHECK, we are organising a codechecking hackathon on 18th September 2023! During this hackathon, you learn the concept behind codechecking, and practise related skills to check whether available code and data can reproduce the results in a paper, preprint or project.

对可重复代码和开放科学感兴趣吗？代码检查是一种轻量级的独立同行评审，用于验证你的代码和数据是否能够生成你在论文或项目中的计算结果。作为代尔夫特理工大学和 CODECHECK 之间试点项目的一部分，我们将于 2023 年 9 月 18 日举办一次代码检查黑客松！在此次黑客松中，你将学习代码检查的概念，并练习相关技能，以检查可用的代码和数据是否能够重现论文、预印本或项目中的结果。

 

ONLINE EVENTS 

在线活动

25 September 2023--Webinar–The FUTURE OF PEER REVIEW

2023 年 9 月 25 日--网络研讨会–未来同行评审

In this webinar, two members of the Proceedings B editorial board (Preprint/Senior Editor Maurine Neiman and Associate Editor Stephanie Meirmans) will be joined by a published author in the journal (Kathleen Grogan) to explore trends in peer review and how they see peer review evolving with time. Together with Andrew Dunn (Senior Publishing Editor for Royal Society Open Science), who will chair the discussion, this webinar will examine issues such as transparency in peer review, the key influences driving change, and how matters such as equity, diversity and inclusivity can be most effectively addressed to ensure a better future for peer review.

在本次网络研讨会上，Proceedings B 编辑委员会的两位成员（预印本/资深编辑 Maurine Neiman 和副编辑 Stephanie Meirmans）将与期刊的一位已发表作者（Kathleen Grogan）共同探讨同行评审的趋势，以及他们如何看待同行评审随时间的发展变化。皇家学会开放科学资深出版编辑 Andrew Dunn（本次讨论的主持人）将与他们一起探讨同行评审中的透明度问题、推动变革的关键影响因素，以及如何最有效地解决诸如公平性、多样性和包容性等问题，以确保同行评审的未来更加美好。

 

28 September 2023--Webinar–The Great Peer Review Debate: Open, Closed, and Transparent Models

2023年9月28日--网络研讨会–大辩论：开放、封闭和透明的同行评审模式

A webinar discussing different peer review models (closed, open, and transparent), including benefits and challenges to each. The panelists will discuss the models used by their publications and the ongoing evolution of peer review models in scholarly publishing.

关于不同同行评审模式（封闭式、开放式和透明式）的网络研讨会，包括每种模式的优缺点。与会者将讨论其出版物所采用的评审模式以及同行评审模式在学术出版领域的持续演变。

 

28 September 2023--Webinar–Best Practices in Peer Review

2023年9月28日--网络研讨会——同行评审最佳实践

Are you a researcher interested in performing quality peer review? Is it important for researchers to be recognized for this work? Most researchers want to be part of the solution to the existing problems with academic peer review. Do you? Join us for this free webinar hosted by scientifyRESEARCH for Peer Review Week. Sign up today and don’t miss this chance to learn more about how you can improve the peer review experience.

您是否是一名希望进行高质量同行评审的研究人员？同行评审工作是否应该得到认可？大多数研究人员都希望参与到解决现有学术同行评审问题的解决方案中。您也是吗？请参加由 scientifyRESEARCH 主办的免费网络研讨会，为 Peer Review 周助力。今天就注册，不要错过了解如何改进同行评审体验的机会。

We have invited two expert guest speakers: Gareth Dyke, PhD from Reviewer Credits; Shivendra Naidoo from ORCID

我们邀请了两位专家嘉宾发言：来自 Reviewer Credits 的 Gareth Dyke 博士；来自 ORCID 的 Shivendra Naidoo

 

28 September 2023--Webinar–The Future of Peer Review: Diversification and Decentralization?

2023年9月28日--网络研讨会–未来同行评审的可能性：多元化与分散化？

HighWire’s Best Practices Webinar Series on ‘The Future of Peer Review: Diversification and Decentralization?’ will examine different types of community and third-party peer review services, and examine how community peer review, including pre-submission and post acceptance review, fits into the future of peer review. Panel includes representatives from PREreview, eLife and PubPeer.

HighWire 的“未来同行评审：多元化与分散化？”最佳实践网络研讨会系列将探讨不同类型的社区和第三方同行评审服务，并分析社区同行评审，包括投稿前和接受后评审，如何融入未来同行评审的框架。嘉宾包括 PREreview、eLife 和 PubPeer 的代表。

 

27 September 2023--Webinar–Training Peer Reviewers as a Form of Engagement: a solution to the peer review crisis?

2023年9月27日--网络研讨会–通过培训同行评审者进行参与：同行评审危机的解决方案吗？

Peer review is an essential part of scholarly communications but is entirely volunteer driven. Journals are, however, struggling to find motivated peer reviewers or reviewers that can be relied upon to provide a fair and thorough evaluation. Could the offer of reviewer training simultaneously help motivate commitments to review as well as improve quality? This presentation re-evaluates the relationship between journals/funders/societies/publishers and their volunteer reviewer base and suggests offering some form of training program could be a valuable form of engagement.

同行评审是学术交流不可或缺的一部分，但完全是志愿性质的。然而，期刊在寻找有动力的同行评审者或可以信赖的评审者进行公平和全面的评估方面遇到了困难。是否可以通过提供评审培训同时激励评审承诺并提高评审质量？本次演讲重新评估了期刊/资助机构/学会/出版商与其志愿评审者群体之间的关系，并建议提供某种形式的培训项目可能是有价值的参与方式。

 

26 September 2023--Webinar–Launch of the Peer Review Terminology Standard

2023年9月26日--网络研讨会–同行评审术语标准发布

Peer review is the process of evaluating academic, scientific, or professional work. It is ubiquitously used by academic journals to support research integrity by filtering out invalid or poor-quality articles, as well as to ensure that research outcomes are exposed to relevant audiences through their publication in relevant journals. As such, it is a crucial process in scholarly communication and a pillar of the scientific method.

同行评审是评估学术、科学或专业工作的过程。它广泛应用于学术期刊中，以支持研究诚信，通过过滤掉无效或质量低的文章，确保研究结果能够通过相关期刊的出版，被相关受众了解。因此，它是学术交流中的关键过程，也是科学研究方法的支柱。

Over recent decades, a significant number of new peer review models have been introduced (most notably for open review), but they have not been accompanied by the development of a clear and consistent nomenclature, leading to confusion. There is also increased support for more openness and transparency in science and research, including peer review, in order to maintain trust in the scholarly ecosystem.

近年来，许多新的同行评审模式被引入（最显著的是开放同行评审），但这些模式并没有伴随着清晰一致的术语发展，导致了混乱。此外，科学和研究领域也增加了更多开放性和透明度的支持，包括同行评审，以维护学术生态系统中的信任。

Against this background, in 2019, STM (the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers) recognized the need to support the community in ensuring greater transparency and openness in peer review, which is an essential element of open research. This support includes harmonizing and better communicating definitions of discrete elements of these processes so that members of the community—whether they be authors, reviewers, editors, or readers—can quickly and easily recognize how to more productively participate in the creation and qualification of scholarly content. Recently, this Peer Review Terminology has become a formal ANSI/NISO standard. Initially, the taxonomy is designed for peer review of journal articles, but the intention is to expand to other outputs in the future (e.g., books), based on demand.

在此背景下，2019 年，国际科学、技术和医学出版商协会（STM）认识到有必要支持科研社区，以确保同行评审过程更加透明和开放，这是开放科研不可或缺的要素。这种支持包括协调和更好地传达这些过程各个独立环节的定义，以便社区成员（无论是作者、审稿人、编辑还是读者）能够快速而容易地识别如何更有效地参与学术内容的创作和评估。最近，这一同行评审术语已经正式成为 ANSI/NISO 标准。最初，这一分类法设计用于期刊文章的同行评审，但未来将根据需求扩展到其他输出（例如书籍）。

 

27 September 2023--Webinar–Effective Peer Review: The Future of Publishing

2023年9月27日--网络研讨会–有效的同行评审：出版的未来

An interactive webinar on the topic of “Effective Peer Review: The Future of Publishing”.

一个关于“有效的同行评审：出版的未来”的互动网络研讨会。

 

26 September 2023--ISMTE Office Hours session–Peer Review and the Future of Publishing: Strategies for Finding Reviewers

2023年9月26日--ISMTE 办公室时间会话—评议与出版的未来：寻找评议人的策略

Finding reviewers is often a challenge for editors and editorial offices. In celebration of Peer Review Week 2023, Mia Ricci and Sarah Dedej will lead a conversation on strategies for identifying reviewers and discuss AGU’s initiative to encourage and transparently acknowledge co-reviewers. Attendees can actively participate in the session by sharing their own experiences and/or asking questions.

寻找评议人往往是编辑和编辑部的挑战。为了庆祝 2023 年同行评议周，Mia Ricci 和 Sarah Dedej 将带领一场关于识别评议人策略的对话，并讨论 AGU 发起的鼓励并透明认可共同评议人的倡议。参会者可以通过分享自己的经验或提问积极参与此次会话。

 

26 September 2023--Webinar–Launch of the Peer Review Terminology Standard

2023年9月26日--网络研讨会–同行评审术语标准发布

In recent decades, many new peer review models have emerged — without being accompanied by a clear and consistent nomenclature, leading to confusion. With increasing support for more openness and transparency in science and research, in 2019 STM began developing a harmonized set of peer review definitions defining the various elements of the peer review process to enable a common understanding among authors, reviewers, editors and readers. This workshop will present this Peer Review Terminology, which recently became a formal ANSI/NISO standard.

近年来，出现了许多新的同行评审模式——但缺乏清晰一致的术语，导致了混乱。随着对科学和研究中更多开放性和透明度的支持增加，2019 年，STM 开始制定一套同行评审定义，以定义同行评审过程中的各个要素，从而实现作者、审稿人、编辑和读者之间的共同理解。本次研讨会将介绍这一同行评审术语，该术语最近已成为正式的 ANSI/NISO 标准。

 

26 September 2023--Webinar–Breaking the mould: exploring the impact of peer review innovations on the future

2023年9月26日--网络研讨会–突破陈规：探索同行评审创新对未来的影响

Scholarly publishing is entering a new era of radical change. The rise of Open Access (OA), open science, big data, Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the landscape like never before. In this unsettling yet transformative time, it is imperative for stakeholders across the scholarly ecosystem to collaborate proactively and ensure that peer review evolves such that it continues to be our most powerful tool for evaluating the rigor, credibility, and interest of scholarly research. Join us as we explore the different trends, learn about the different “futures” that the community envisions, and discuss what is needed to prepare for this future.

学术出版正步入一个全新的变革时代。开放获取（OA）、开放科学、大数据、自然语言处理（NLP）和人工智能（AI）的兴起，以前所未有的方式重塑着学术出版的格局。在这个令人不安但又充满变革的时代，学术生态系统中的所有利益相关者必须积极合作，确保同行评审能够继续成为我们评估学术研究的严谨性、可信度和兴趣的最有力工具。加入我们，共同探讨不同的趋势，了解社区所设想的“未来”，并讨论为迎接这一未来所需准备的条件。

EASE has partnered with Editage from Cactus Communication, to bring you this webinar.

EASE 已与 Cactus Communication 的 Editage 合作，为您带来这场网络研讨会。

Christopher Leonard, Director, Strategy and Innovation, Cactus Communication will host a panel of three speakers:

Cactus Communication 战略与创新总监克里斯托弗·莱昂纳德将主持三位演讲嘉宾：

Sven Fund, Managing Director, Reviewers Credits

斯文·芬德，审稿人信用管理董事

Phill Jones, Co-founder, Digital and Technology, MoreBrains Consulting Cooperative

Phill Jones, MoreBrains Consulting Cooperative 数字和技术联合创始人

Ksenija Baždarić, Editor-in-Chief European Science Editing

Ksenija Baždarić，欧洲科学编辑主编

 

[webinar on Demand] Mind the content gap: Going digital-first to streamline the journey from journal submission to publication

[按需网络研讨会] 注意内容缺口：以数字化优先转型简化从投稿到发表的旅程

Today, virtually every scholarly journal team is looking for ways to be more efficient, yet few are taking a truly “digital-first” approach to publishing. Moving to a single-source digital production process and integrating it with peer review and publishing workflows can help journals cut submission formatting steps for authors and editors, prevent proofing errors, and streamline metadata transmission to archives and discovery services—leading to faster, more robust content dissemination and lower costs.

如今，几乎每家学术期刊团队都在寻找提高效率的方法，但很少有团队真正采取“数字化优先”的出版方式。转向单一来源的数字化生产流程，并将其与同行评审和出版工作流程集成，可以帮助期刊简化作者和编辑的投稿格式步骤，防止校样错误，并简化元数据传输到存档和发现服务的过程——从而实现更快、更稳健的内容传播，并降低运营成本。

This free ALPSP webinar, sponsored by Scholastica, digs into the benefits of transitioning to digital-first peer review and publishing processes and different possible routes to get started or optimize your current efforts.

这是一场由 Scholastica 赞助的免费 ALPSP 网络研讨会，深入探讨了转向数字化优先的同行评审和出版流程的好处，以及不同的起步或优化现有努力的途径。

The full webinar is now available to watch on demand!

全程网络研讨会现已上线，您可以随时观看！

More information and register

了解更多并注册

 

25 September 2023--PREreview Open Reviewers Community workshop

2023年9月25日--PREreview 开放审稿人社区研讨会

Peer review, just as any other process, protocol, policy, or structure, is conducted by people and thus is naturally subject to influence by the biases of people. This workshop discusses how bias shows up in peer review and highlights strategies and guidelines on how to reflect on our own biases and provide clear and constructive feedback.

同行评审，就像任何其他过程、协议、政策或结构一样，都是由人来进行的，因此自然会受到人的偏见的影响。本次研讨会讨论了偏见在同行评审中如何表现，并强调了反思自身偏见和提供清晰、建设性反馈的策略和指南。

 

26 September 2023--Webinar–Publishing Genomics Papers of the Future

2023年9月26日--网络研讨会–发表未来的基因组学论文

In this special event, we’ll hear from the Editor in Chief, Professor Hervé Perdry, and Managing Editor of the Human Heredity journal, Dr Anthony Herzig, as they provide live feedback on lightning presentations from members of the Genomics England researcher community and take questions from attendees about publishing and the future of peer review. An exciting opportunity to find out more about getting published, peer review and the future of publishing.

在此次特别活动中，我们将听取主编、赫维·佩德里教授和《人类遗传学》期刊的副主编安东尼·赫尔兹博士的意见，他们将对来自英国基因组学研究者社区成员的快速展示进行现场反馈，并回答参会者关于发表和同行评审未来的提问。这是一个了解发表、同行评审以及未来出版的好机会。

 

28 September 2023--2023 PRW China sub-Forum

2023年9月28日--2023 PRW 中国分论坛

On the morning of September 28, 2023, the online conference of the International Peer Review Week China Forum, sponsored by China Editology Society of Science Periodicals and the Academic Steering Committee of the International Peer Review Week, and hosted by the International Cooperation and Exchange Working Committee of China Editology Society of Science Periodicals, will be held with the theme of “Peer Review and the future of publishing”. Researchers, STM journal editors, library and information personnel and other relevant peers will participate in the conference online. Peer Review Week (PRW) is an annual global event sponsored and organized by international academic publishers, research institutions, science and technology associations, and researchers to promote the role of peer review in ensuring the quality of academic papers. The event brings together academic publishers, researchers and research organizations to work together to optimize and improve the quality of the peer review process. The 2023 International Peer Review Week will be held globally from 25 to 29 September 2023.

2023 年 9 月 28 日上午，由中国科技期刊编辑学会和国际同行评议周学术指导委员会联合主办，由中国科技期刊编辑学会国际合作与交流工作委员会承办的国际同行评议周中国论坛在线会议将以“同行评议与出版未来”为主题举行。研究人员、STM 期刊编辑、图书馆及信息人员及其他相关同行将在线参加此次会议。国际同行评议周（PRW）是由国际学术出版商、研究机构、科技协会和研究人员联合主办和组织的年度全球活动，旨在促进同行评议在保证学术论文质量方面的作用。该活动将学术出版商、研究人员和研究机构聚集在一起，共同优化和改进同行评议过程。2023 年国际同行评议周将于 2023 年 9 月 25 日至 29 日全球举行。

 

26 September 2023--Webinar–Peering into Peer Review

2023年9月26日--网络研讨会—探秘同行评审

This panel-style webinar is designed to familiarize Ph. D. students and postdoctoral fellows with the peer review process and to bring attention to opportunities within ASM for trainees to serve as peer reviewers.

这种板式网络研讨会旨在让博士生和博士后研究人员熟悉同行评审过程，并关注 ASM 为培训人员提供担任同行评审者的机遇。

Learning Objectives   学习目标

– Understand how peer reviewers are chosen by editors

– 了解编辑如何选择同行评审者

– Write critical, yet constructive and professional reviews

– 写出既尖锐又建设性和专业的评审意见

– Respond effectively to peer review comments in revisions

– 在修订中有效回应同行评审意见

 

26 September 2023--Webinar–How-To Peer Review

2023年9月26日--网络研讨会——如何进行同行评审

As part of Peer Review Week 2023, join us for an introduction and how-to session on peer review. Peer review is an essential part of academic writing and publishing. Learn about how to complete a peer review, why peer review is important, and ethical dimensions of peer review. We’ll run through some examples of providing peer review, with lots of time for any questions.

作为 2023 年同行评审周的一部分，欢迎参加我们的同行评审介绍和操作指南。同行评审是学术写作和出版的重要组成部分。了解如何完成同行评审、同行评审的重要性以及同行评审的伦理维度。我们将通过一些示例来说明如何进行同行评审，并留出大量时间回答任何问题。

In this session, we’ll cover:

在本场研讨会上，我们将涵盖：

– Overview of Peer Review

– 同行评审概览

– How-to Peer Review

– 如何进行同行评审

– Bias and Power in Peer Review

– 同行评审中的偏见与权力

– Finding Opportunities to Peer Review

– 寻找同行评审的机会

This is an introductory session and geared towards graduate students and those new to academia, but all are welcome to join.

这是一个面向研究生和学术新手的介绍性会话，但所有人均可参加。

 

20 September 2023--Online Live Discussion with Panelists–Peer Review to PR: How peer review supports sound science reporting

2023年9月20日--在线直播讨论——同行评审到公开发布：同行评审如何支持科学报道的严谨性

This ‘in-conversation’ style event will discuss the process of peer review (both open and closed) and how this helps provide the best science, both for further research and for the public understanding of science and science communication. The discussion will draw on the panels’ own experience of being peer reviewed and having their research reported in the media, as well as peer reviewing themselves. From the other side, science journalists will share their experience of working with researchers, pre-prints and peer reviewed papers, and how this relates to the public understanding of science.

这种“对话式”活动将讨论同行评审过程（包括开放同行评审和封闭同行评审），以及这种评审如何帮助提供最严谨的科学，既为后续研究提供支持，也为公众理解和科学传播提供支持。讨论将借鉴评审小组成员自身的同行评审经验，以及他们的研究成果被媒体报道的情况，同时也会涉及他们自己进行同行评审的经历。从另一个角度看，科学记者将分享与研究人员、预印本和同行评审论文合作的经验，以及这些经验如何与公众对科学的理解相关联。

 

25 September 2023--Webinar–Feminist Futures of Peer Review

2023年9月25日--网络研讨会–女性主义的同行评审未来

Peer review and evaluation are at the heart of academia but so often the racially gendered labor of this work is ignored, denied, or compounded.

同行评审和评估是学术界的核心，但这种工作中的种族和性别劳动往往被忽视、否认或加剧。

It’s also no secret that the standard peer review process is in deep crisis as the COVID-19 pandemic and onslaught of professional and personal demands have dramatically reduced the number of peer reviewers available while click-based publishing models have incentivized more and more output with fewer and fewer resources.

同行评审的标准流程也正处于深刻的危机之中，新冠疫情和职业与个人需求的冲击大大减少了可用的同行评审者数量，而基于点击的出版模式则激励了更多的产出，却提供了更少的资源。

Intersectional feminism has long provided alternative models and futures for peer review though, including approaching review as collective support, making visible the racially gendered labor of reviewing, and using review to signal-boost and deeply engage with the work of marginalized scholars.

交叉性女权主义长期以来为同行评审提供了替代模式和未来愿景，包括将评审视为集体支持，使评审中的种族和性别劳动可见，并利用评审来提升边缘化学者的工作并深入与其互动。

Join Ideas on Fire for a panel discussion with 4 interdisciplinary feminist scholars about how they are navigating peer review in our contemporary moment and collectively building intersectional feminist futures to support engaged research and critical thinking.

欢迎参加“思想之火”组织的一场关于四位跨学科女权主义学者如何在当前时刻导航同行评审，并共同构建交叉性女权主义未来以支持参与式研究和批判性思维的圆桌讨论。

 

27 September 2023--AATS Journals Webinar: Tips and recommendations for Statistical Review

2023年9月27日--AATS 期刊网络研讨会：统计审查的提示与建议

This AATS Journals webinar will feature several statistical editors discussing statistical reviews (primarily for medical journals) and highlighting specific analyses authors/reviewers should be familiar with. Audience members are encouraged to ask questions for a live Q&A session at the end of the hour.

本次 AATS 期刊网络研讨会将邀请几位统计编辑讨论统计审查（主要针对医学期刊）的相关内容，并强调作者/审稿人应熟悉的具体分析方法。参会者被鼓励在会议结束时提出问题进行现场问答。

 

27 September 2023--online panel discussion–Peer Review in an Era of Open Science: a transdisciplinary debate

2023年9月27日--在线圆桌讨论——开放科学时代的同行评审：跨学科辩论

The event seeks to foster a transdisciplinary conversation about the roles, frameworks, and objectives of peer review, with a specific emphasis on digital advancements and the complexities posed by open science. This discussion will involve a panel of experts spanning various fields, including philosophy, medicine, mathematics, sociology, who have conducted extensive research on peer review and/or the challenges associated with open science. These experts also bring practical experience as editors and/or founders of scientific journals, giving them direct insights into the management issues involved. How can we harmonize the transparency demands of open science with the fairness standards ensured by confidential assessment? Is there potential for a unified model for peer review management, or should we maintain diversity and uphold disciplinary traditions? Can we envision alternative methods for assessing knowledge? Will peer review and scientific journals, as we currently know them, endure over the next two decades?

该活动旨在促进跨学科对话，探讨同行评审的角色、框架和目标，特别关注数字技术进步以及开放科学带来的复杂性。讨论将涉及来自哲学、医学、数学、社会学等领域的专家，他们对同行评审及其与开放科学相关挑战进行了广泛研究。这些专家还具有作为编辑或科学期刊创始人的实际经验，使他们能够直接洞察管理问题。如何在保持保密评估的公平标准的同时满足开放科学的透明度要求？是否有可能建立统一的同行评审管理模式，还是应该保持多样性并维护学科传统？我们能否设想出评估知识的替代方法？在接下来的二十年里，我们所熟知的同行评审和科学期刊是否会继续存在？

 

26 September 2023--Webinar–Fostering trust through transparent peer review

2023年9月26日--网络研讨会——通过透明同行评审培养信任

Please join us for a webinar presentation that will discuss:

请参加我们的网络研讨会，我们将讨论：

– What can we learn about fake peer review by looking at retractions for that and related reasons?

通过查看因类似原因被撤稿的情况，我们可以学到关于虚假同行评审的哪些知识？

– How will the wider adoption of open peer review support research integrity?

— 广泛采用开放同行评审将如何支持科研诚信？

– Why and how has the Royal Society of Chemistry implemented transparent peer review as part of its commitment to open science?

— 皇家化学学会为何并如何将透明同行评审作为其开放科学承诺的一部分予以实施？

– How will Clarivate continue to develop products, including the Transparent Peer Review service on ScholarOne™ and the Web of Science™, to support the shift to open peer review?

—Clarivate 将如何继续开发产品，包括 ScholarOne™的透明同行评审服务和 Web of Science™，以支持开放同行评审的转变？

 

27 September 2023--Webinar–Adapting to AI in Peer Review and the Publishing Process

2023年9月27日--网络研讨会–适应 AI 在同行评审和出版过程中的应用

Join Sonja Krane, Sr Assoc Publisher, ACS Publications, and Osvaldo Oliviera, Executive Editor, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces for an interview and audience Q&A session on AI and the impact to the peer review and publishing processes and systems. Attend and be part of the conversation as we enable a deeper understanding of AI while addressing critical issues to ensure its responsible and effective implementation in the scientific community.

请加入 ACS Publications 高级副出版商 Sonja Krane 和 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 执行编辑 Osvaldo Oliveira，参与关于 AI 对同行评审和出版过程及系统的影响的访谈和观众问答环节。参与进来，共同探讨 AI 的深层次理解，同时解决关键问题，确保其在科学界负责任和有效实施。

 

24 September 2023--Invite Only Panel Discussion–Peer Review and The Future of Publishing: Trends and Predictions by Industry Experts

2023年9月24日--仅限受邀参加——同行评审与出版未来的趋势与预测：行业专家观点

This year, ACSE has extended invitations to esteemed industry experts to convene and collectively explore the central theme of Peer Review Week.

今年，ACSE 邀请了杰出的行业专家齐聚一堂，共同探讨 Peer Review Week 的核心主题。

Interested candidates may contact us at acse@theacse.com to join this panel discussion.

有意参加的候选人可联系 acse@theacse.com 加入此次圆桌讨论。

 

26 September 2023--Engaging with Open Science 2023: OPEN PEER REVIEW

2023年9月26日--参与开放科学 2023：开放同行评审

IntechOpen is organising the third session of ‘Engaging with Open Science 2023’ webinar series, focusing on Open Peer Review, coinciding with Peer Review Week on September 26th at 2 pm UK time/3 pm CET/9 am ET. Speakers, Adrian Stanley and Alessio Bolognesi, experts in open peer review, will discuss challenges and innovations around peer review models. Chaired by Dr. Sarah Greaves, this webinar is ideal for researchers, peer reviewers, and editors interested in peer review advancements.

IntechOpen 正在举办“参与开放科学 2023”网络研讨会系列的第三场活动，主题为“开放同行评审”，并与同行评审周于 9 月 26 日英国夏令时下午 2 点/中欧时间下午 3 点/美国东部时间上午 9 点同步进行。演讲嘉宾阿德里安·斯坦利和亚列西奥·博洛内西是开放同行评审领域的专家，将讨论同行评审模式中的挑战与创新。本次网络研讨会由莎拉·格雷夫斯博士主持，非常适合对同行评审进展感兴趣的科研人员、同行评审者和编辑。

 

27 September 2023--Webinar–Co-review: supporting equal recognition

2023年9月27日--网络研讨会–共同审稿：支持平等认可

With the implementation of co-reviewing functionality across all IOP Publishing’s owned journals, researchers can now receive recognition for their peer review work. Join us for a live webinar to discover how co-review can support senior and early career researchers. Talks will provide insight into the initiative and an opportunity to hear from a PhD student who has experienced the co-reviewing process.

随着 IOP Publishing 所有自营期刊中共同审稿功能的实施，研究人员现在可以因他们的同行评审工作获得认可。加入我们，参加一场实时网络研讨会，了解共同审稿如何支持资深和早期职业研究人员。演讲将提供对该倡议的见解，并提供一个机会，让一位体验过共同审稿流程的博士生分享她的经历。

 

29 September 2023--Online, live panel discussion–Editorial Board Members Tackle Peer Review & The Future of Publishing

2023年9月29日--在线直播，编辑委员会成员探讨同行评审与出版的未来

Have you ever struggled to address the variety of feedback between the same cohort of peer reviewers? Are you curious to know how peer review might change with the rise of preprints? In honor of Peer Review Week 2023, join Lane Library in attending our panel session with editorial board members from a variety of Biomedical Journals to discuss peer review and the future of publishing, and address community-generated questions.

您是否曾因同一组同行评审者的反馈多样性而感到困扰？您是否好奇随着预印本的兴起，同行评审可能会发生怎样的变化？为庆祝 2023 年同行评审周，欢迎参加由 Lane 图书馆组织的与来自多种生物医学期刊的编辑委员会成员举行的圆桌讨论，讨论同行评审与出版的未来，并解答社区提出的问题。

 

27 September 2023--Webinar–Redefining Peer Review: Prophy’s AI-Powered Approach

2023年9月27日--网络研讨会–重塑同行评审：Prophy 的人工智能驱动方法

As a part of the Peer Review Week 2023 Prophy presents a webinar delineating the pivotal role of AI in reshaping the scientific publishing landscape. Set aside time to learn from industry mavericks and thought leaders who are steering the revolution in peer review processes.

作为 2023 年同行评审周的一部分，Prophy 将举办一场网络研讨会，阐述人工智能在重塑科学出版格局中的关键作用。请拨冗聆听行业先锋和思想领袖如何引领同行评审流程的革命。

 

27 September 2023--Webinar–Future of Peer Review in Research Publishing: Navigating possibilities and challenges

2023年9月27日--网络研讨会–研究出版中的同行评审未来：导航可能性与挑战

As the scientific community continues to evolve, so does the way we evaluate and disseminate knowledge. Dive into the heart of peer review’s present and future dynamics alongside leading experts at the forefront of academia, publishing, and technology. In this interactive session, the panelists will explore the sustainability of the current peer review models, challenges faced, and the transformative impact of AI integration in a rapidly evolving research landscape. Join this free webinar, ask probing questions, engage with our panelists, and together, let’s shape a future of efficient, equitable, and high-quality research dissemination!

随着科学界不断演变，我们评估和传播知识的方式也在变化。与学术界、出版界和科技领域的领先专家一起，深入探讨同行评审的现状与未来动态。在本次互动研讨会上，与会者将探讨当前同行评审模式的可持续性、面临的挑战以及人工智能集成在快速变化的研究环境中带来的变革性影响。免费参加本次网络研讨会，提出深入的问题，与我们的与会者互动，让我们共同塑造一个高效、公平且高质量的研究传播未来！

 

27 September 2023--AUPresses Hangout: The Future of Peer Reviewers

2023年9月27日--AUPresses 沟通会：同行评审的未来

As university presses simultaneously seek to diversify, balance, and create more inclusive reviewer pools and to acquire more trade projects and/or non-traditional genres of scholarship, the profile of an “expert” shifts as does the role an acquisitions editor might play in the peer review process. In this webinar, we will explore the future of peer reviewers: who we ask, or might ask, to do peer review and how we do so.

随着大学出版社同时寻求扩大、平衡并创建更具包容性的审稿人库，以及获取更多的贸易项目和/or 非传统学术类型，专家的定义发生了变化，收购编辑在同行评审过程中的角色也随之变化。在本次网络研讨会中，我们将探讨同行评审的未来：我们可能会邀请谁来进行同行评审，以及我们如何进行邀请。

 

28 September 2023--Public Zoom discussion–Lunch & Learn: Let’s Talk Peer Review

2023年9月28日--公开网络会议讨论-午餐学习会：让我们谈谈同行评审

Join us on Thursday, September 28, at 12 p.m. EST for a special conversation with editors from Patient Safety and author/peer reviewer Zane Wolf, PhD, RN, professor of Nursing Programs and dean emerita at the School of Nursing and Health Sciences, La Salle University. How does peer review work, and why is it so vital to scientific publishing?

请于美国东部时间 2023 年 9 月 28 日中午 12 点加入我们，与《患者安全》杂志的编辑以及作者/同行评审人 Zane Wolf 博士、RN（拉塞尔大学护理与健康科学学院的护理项目教授及名誉院长）进行特别对话。同行评审是如何运作的，又是为什么对科学出版如此重要？

How do editors use peer reviews, and how should authors respond to them? Bring your questions (and your lunch!) to learn more, including how you can become a peer reviewer for academic journals.

编辑如何使用同行评审，作者又应该如何回应？请带着你的问题（以及午餐）来了解更多，包括如何成为学术期刊的同行评审人。

 

27 September 2023--Webinar – Generative AI in research evaluation

2023年9月27日--网络研讨会 — 生成式 AI 在研究评估中的应用

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT can create anything from poems to Python code. Researchers are increasingly using AI both as part of their research and to communicate and publish their work. These tools are powerful, but there are concerns with confidentiality and ethics, their output is not always accurate, and their operation can be difficult to understand. Join panelists Giovanni Cacciamani (University of Southern California), Andrew Hufton (Cell Press), Bahar Mehmani (Elsevier), and Lisa Rasmussen (University of North Carolina, Charlotte) as we discuss what actually happens when a researcher uploads content to ChatGPT, how to peer review research that incorporates generative AI in its methods, and whether there are any appropriate applications of AI in the peer review process.

像 ChatGPT 这样的生成式 AI 工具可以创建从诗歌到 Python 代码的各种内容。研究人员越来越多地将 AI 作为其研究的一部分，以及用于沟通和发表研究成果。这些工具功能强大，但存在保密性和伦理方面的担忧，其输出并不总是准确的，其运行机制也难以理解。请加入 Giovanni Cacciamani（南加州大学）、Andrew Hufton（Cell Press）、Bahar Mehmani（爱思唯尔）和 Lisa Rasmussen（北卡罗来纳大学夏洛特分校）等嘉宾，共同探讨当研究人员将内容上传到 ChatGPT 时究竟发生了什么，如何对包含生成式 AI 方法的研究进行同行评审，以及在同行评审过程中是否适合使用 AI 的任何适当应用。

 

10 October 2023--Webinar–Giving CRediT Where it’s Due: What journals need to know about the Contributor Roles Taxonomy

2023年10月10日--网络研讨会–给予应得的信用：期刊需要了解的贡献者角色分类法

Want to learn more about how scholarly journals can implement CRediT (The Contributor Roles Taxonomy) to increase recognition of and transparency around the various possible forms of research contribution beyond writing and editing?

想了解更多关于如何通过 CRediT（贡献者角色分类法）来增加对研究贡献（不仅仅是写作和编辑之外的各种可能形式的研究贡献）的认可和透明度吗？

This free webinar hosted by Scholastica will dive into what you need to know about the emerging ANSI/NISO standard, including how CRediT simplifies verifying types/levels of research contribution, the roles of editors and scholars in implementing CRediT, and answers to FAQs with examples from CRediT adopters at the American Chemical Society and AACR. We’ll also zoom out to discuss the benefits of the Taxonomy for the broader research community and new and emerging use cases for CRediT metadata. All registrants get a link to the recording!

Scholastica 主办的这场免费网络研讨会将深入探讨您需要了解的新兴 ANSI/NISO 标准，包括 CRediT 如何简化验证研究贡献类型/水平的过程，编辑和学者在实施 CRediT 中的角色，以及来自美国化学学会和 AACR 的 CRediT 采用者的常见问题解答示例。我们还将从更广泛的视角讨论分类法对研究社区的好处以及 CRediT 元数据的新颖和新兴应用场景。所有注册者都将获得录播视频的链接！

 

28 September 2023--Understanding Peer Review and How it Works 同行评审全过程解读 (Mandarin Speaking Session）

2023年9月28日--同行评审全过程解读（中文演讲环节）

In this webinar, we will will walk you through each step of the peer review process, shedding light on its significance, challenges, and best practices, offering valuable guidance to researchers at all stages of their careers. Whether you are a seasoned researcher or just starting out, this event aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the peer review process and equip you with practical strategies to navigate it successfully.

在本次网络研讨会中，我们将带领您逐步了解同行评审过程的每一个步骤，揭示其重要性、挑战和最佳实践，为处于职业生涯各个阶段的研究人员提供宝贵的指导。无论您是经验丰富的研究人员还是刚刚起步，本活动旨在为您提供全面的同行评审过程理解，并帮助您掌握成功应对这一过程的实用策略。

Who will attend? Early-career researchers: Graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and researchers who are new to the peer review process and seeking guidance on navigating it effectively.

谁将参加？早期职业研究人员：研究生、博士后学者以及新参与同行评审过程的研究人员，他们寻求有效导航该过程的指导。

Anyone interested in scholarly publishing: Individuals interested in the academic publishing world, including librarians, students, and individuals from related industries.

任何对学术出版感兴趣的人员：对学术出版领域感兴趣的个人，包括图书管理员、学生以及相关行业的人员。

 

29 September 2023--Future of Peer Review and Transdisciplinary Conversations in the Global South

2023年9月29日--未来同行评议与全球南方跨学科对话

As part of Peer Review Week 2023, on its theme of ‘Peer Review and The Future of Publishing’, this panel discussion organised by Urbanisation journal brings together experts working in editorial roles in journals from the humanities, sciences, and social sciences to discuss changes in peer review and its future pathways.

作为 2023 年同行评议周的一部分，以“同行评议与出版的未来”为主题，由《城市化》期刊组织的这一圆桌讨论会汇集了来自人文学科、自然科学和社会科学期刊的编辑专家，共同探讨同行评议的变化及其未来路径。

Peer review has undergone a sea change, from impacts on selection of peer reviewers, to the move towards open peer review models, and the increasing and varied adoption of AI in scholarship. The panel will discuss these aspects of peer review in the context of transdisciplinary conversations and scholarship from the global South.

同行评议经历了翻天覆地的变化，从对同行评议者选择的影响，到向开放同行评议模式的转变，再到人工智能在学术研究中的日益多样化应用。圆桌讨论会将从跨学科对话和全球南方的学术研究视角探讨这些同行评议方面的变化。

 

 

BLOGS

博客

Scientific peer review done right

科学同行评审做得对

A small daily blog post, highlighting the key areas to focus on when peer reviewing scientific publications: introduction, methodology (with reference to PRO-Map), results, discussion (main contributions and limitations), and a final post on how to address issues in scope, impact, integrity, and clarity.

一篇简短的日志，重点介绍了在审阅科学出版物时需要关注的关键领域：引言、方法（参考 PRO-Map）、结果、讨论（主要贡献和局限性），以及最后一篇关于如何解决范围、影响、完整性和清晰度方面问题的日志。

 

Generative AI: Key leverage issues for peer review

生成式 AI：同行评审的关键杠杆问题

This is a blog that raises the key leverage issues of generative Artificial Intelligence for peer review : How would be the future of publishing if peer review would be made using AI text generation models (such as ChatGPT) ? AI based review assistant tools, such as Raxter.io, are rapidly evolving to support reviewers in furnishing feedback to authors and offering recommendations on enhancing the manuscript. It is perfect as long as these tools are used in tandem with reviewers expertise to assist them in their hard and time-consuming task. In contrast, it would be problematic if reviewers only rely on these tools to provide their feedback and notifications ….

这篇博客探讨了生成式人工智能在同行评审中的关键杠杆问题：如果使用 AI 文本生成模型（如 ChatGPT）进行同行评审，出版业的未来会是怎样的？基于 AI 的评审辅助工具，如 Raxter.io，正在迅速发展，以帮助评审者向作者提供反馈并提出改进手稿的建议。只要这些工具与评审者的专业知识结合使用，以协助他们完成艰巨且耗时的任务，这当然是完美的。然而，如果评审者仅依赖这些工具来提供反馈和通知，这将存在问题……

 

Peer Review and the Future of Publishing

同行评审与出版的未来

Unveiling the Dynamic Realm of Peer Review and the Future of Publishing: Peer Review process secures the precision, coherence, and ground-breaking nature of the findings—upholding the credibility and quality of academic achievements. The future of publishing beacons us forward with limitless possibilities, as groundbreaking innovations like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) reshape the very landscape. Let’s nurture an open-minded and supportive disposition toward these transformative changes.

揭示同行评审的动态领域与出版的未来：同行评审过程确保了研究发现的精确性、连贯性和开创性——维护了学术成就的可信度和质量。出版的未来为我们带来了无限可能，如同人工智能（AI）和机器学习（ML）等突破性创新正在重塑整个领域。让我们以开放和支持的态度迎接这些变革。

 

AI and Peer review: Collaborative intelligence and human expertise

AI 与同行评议：协作智能与人类专长

The theme for Peer Review Week 2023 is “Peer review and the future of publishing.” The sudden acceleration of advances in AI in recent months means that this will be a very important topic on everyone’s minds as we think about the future of peer review. This article discusses the potential applications of AI in the peer review process, the guidelines that have been issued so far, and some important considerations that will determine whether and how AI can support peer review.

2023 年同行评议周的主题是“同行评议与出版的未来”。近期 AI 技术的突飞猛进意味着这一话题将成为我们思考同行评议未来的重要议题。本文讨论了 AI 在同行评议过程中的潜在应用、已发布的相关指南，以及决定 AI 能否以及如何支持同行评议的一些重要考虑因素。

 

The Role of Peer Review in Protecting and Promoting Diversity in Scholarly Publishing

同行评审在保护和促进学术出版多样性中的作用

This blogpost explores the role played by peer review and peer reviewers in protecting and promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in scholarly publishing. It outlines actionable strategies that journals and publishers can employ to ensure that the peer review process is fair, especially to authors from underserved or minority communities.

本文探讨了同行评审和同行评审人在保护和促进学术出版中的多样、公平和平等方面所发挥的作用。文中概述了期刊和出版商可以采取的具体策略，以确保同行评审过程的公平性，特别是对来自未充分服务或少数群体的作者。

 

ACS Axial Blog Series

ACS AXIAL 博客系列

Follow the ACS Axial blog during Peer Review Week for a thoughtfully selected series of articles from ACS Publications. Explore the current issues and exciting prospects that are shaping and changing the future of peer review and publishing and how these changes may affect the processes, methods, and people involved.

在 ACS 同行评审周期间，关注 ACS Axial 博客，了解 ACS 出版物精心挑选的一系列文章。探索正在塑造和改变同行评审和出版未来的当前问题与激动人心的前景，并了解这些变化可能如何影响相关流程、方法和人员。

 

The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review

生成式人工智能在同行评审中的作用

This year, as the research community’s trust in the peer review system’s efficacy and efficiency has wavered, we’ve seen a sharp rise in the proposal and implementation of alterations to the standard peer review process. As such, it’s not surprising that the community-selected theme for the 2023 Peer Review Week is “Peer Review and The Future of Publishing.” When taken in context with the runner-up topics— “Peer Review and Technology” and “Ethical Issues in Peer Review”—it’s clear that the medical community is uncertain about many of these changes, especially changes that involve new and unproven technology. In this article, we’ll narrow our focus to a specific topic that embodies much of the potential (both positive and negative) of these changes: the role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in peer review.

今年，随着科研界对同行评审系统有效性和效率的信任度下降，我们看到了对标准同行评审过程进行修改的提议和实施显著增加。因此，2023 年同行评审周由社区选定的主题“同行评审与出版的未来”并不令人意外。考虑到备选主题“同行评审与技术”和“同行评审中的伦理问题”，很明显，医学界对许多这些变化持不确定态度，尤其是涉及新技术的变化。本文将聚焦于一个具体话题，该话题体现了这些变化的许多潜在影响（无论是积极的还是消极的）：生成式人工智能在同行评审中的作用。

 

Will ChatGPT Disrupt Peer Review? Impact of AI on the Hallmark of Science Vigilance

ChatGPT 将颠覆同行评审吗？AI 对科学核心——审慎性的影响

The debate over whether generative AI can challenge the peer review system is ongoing. While AI aids aspects like plagiarism detection and basic grammar checks, it cannot replace human expertise. Concerns include the potential for deception, bias, and misinformation in AI-generated text, especially when peer reviewing original research. Read this article to predict the impact of AI on scientific vigilance with its integration in the peer review week system.

关于生成式 AI 是否能挑战同行评审系统的辩论仍在进行中。虽然 AI 在抄袭检测和基本语法检查方面提供帮助，但它无法替代人类的专业知识。人们担心 AI 生成的文本可能存在欺骗、偏见和误导，尤其是在审阅原创研究时。阅读这篇文章，了解 AI 集成到同行评审周系统中对其对科学审慎性影响的预测。

 

It’s a blog: DISCOVERING THE TOP 5 PEER REVIEW TRENDS AND FUTURE INNOVATIONS

顶级同行评审趋势与未来创新：博客探索

It’s a blog on the top trends in peer review. We’d like to share it on this page.

这是一篇关于同行评审顶级趋势的博客。我们希望在此页面与您分享。

 

Revisión por pares y nuevos productos informativos

审稿人和新信息产品

Es un post con revisión literaria sobre la Revisión por pares. Artículos publicados en las bases de datos SciELo, DOAJ y Latindex

这是一篇关于审稿人内容的文学审查。发表在 SciELo、DOAJ 和 Latindex 数据库中

 

5 Ways academic journals can bridge gaps between peer review and publishing

学术期刊如何弥合同行评审与出版之间的差距的 5 种方式

Mind the gap — you’ve likely heard this familiar phrase issued at train stations, but have you considered how it applies to academic journal publishing? In this blog post, we’re rounding up five of the most common gaps between peer review and publishing processes and ways to address them.

注意空隙——你可能在火车站听过这句话，但你是否考虑过它在学术期刊出版中的应用？在这篇博文中，我们将总结五个最常见的同行评审与出版流程之间的差距，并探讨如何解决这些问题。

 

A PID’s Life: What journals and scholars need to know

PID 的一生：期刊和学者需要了解的内容

Once Persistent Identifiers (a.k.a. PIDs) are born, they take on a whole new, and still somewhat secret, life of their own. This blog post covers the what, why, and how of PIDs and key ways journals and scholars can implement them to foster uptake across the research ecosystem and further their publishing goals, starting with peer review.

一旦持久标识符（简称 PIDs）诞生，它们就会拥有自己全新的、仍然有些神秘的生命。本文介绍了 PIDs 的定义、原因和实现方式，并探讨了期刊和学者如何通过它们在研究生态系统中促进使用，并进一步实现其出版目标，从同行评审开始。

 

5 tips to make your journal’s author guidelines easier to follow (and shorter!)

让您的期刊作者指南更易于遵循（并且更短！）5 条建议

Researchers are busier than ever today, so it’s vital for journals to make their submission processes as frictionless as possible. This blog post offers five tips to help simplify and streamline your author guidelines, featuring emerging submission formatting automation opportunities.

研究人员比以往任何时候都更加忙碌，因此，期刊需要尽可能简化和优化其投稿流程。本文提供了五条建议，帮助简化和优化作者指南，同时介绍了新兴的投稿格式自动化机会。

 

Ready to ROR? Use cases for scholarly publishing stakeholders: Interview with Amanda French

准备好变革了吗？学术出版利益相关方的应用案例：采访 Amanda French

Technical Community Manager for the Research Organization Registry, a.k.a. ROR, Amanda French, discusses how all scholarly communication stakeholders can best adopt and support ROR IDs from the point of manuscript submission and examples of current use cases in this interview.

Research Organization Registry（ROR）的技术社区经理，即 Amanda French，讨论了所有学术交流利益相关方如何在手稿提交阶段最佳地采用和支持 ROR 标识符，并提供了当前使用案例的示例。

 

Innovations in Peer Review: Increasing Capacity While Improving Quality

同行评审的创新：提高容量同时提升质量

Peer review is a critical aspect of modern academic research, but it’s no secret that journals are struggling to provide high-quality and timely peer review for submitted manuscripts. It’s clear that changes are needed to increase the capacity and efficiency of peer review without reducing the quality of the review. However, several alternative peer review models are up to the challenge. We’ll discuss the most well-established alternative peer review strategies, identify some commonalities between models, and provide key takeaways for everyone in academia.

同行评审是现代学术研究的关键环节，但众所周知，期刊在为提交的手稿提供高质量和及时的同行评审方面正面临挑战。显然，需要进行一些改变以在不降低评审质量的前提下提高同行评审的容量和效率。然而，几种替代同行评审模式已经准备好迎接这一挑战。我们将讨论最成熟的替代同行评审策略，找出这些模式之间的共同点，并为学术界的所有成员提供关键要点。

 

View the blog  查看博客

Through the Editor’s Lens: A Blog Mini-Series on the Future of Publishing

通过编辑的视角：关于出版未来的博客小系列

In this 4-part mini-series on our blog De Gruyter Conversations, we share insightful statements from our book and journal editors on four different topics related to this year’s theme of Peer Review Week, The Future of Publishing:

在我们的博客 De Gruyter Conversations 中，我们将分享关于今年主题“同行评审周：出版的未来”相关的四位编辑对四个不同话题的见解，共四个部分的小系列。

1.) Peer Review in a Changing World

1.) 在变化的世界中的同行评审

2.) Artificial Intelligence and Peer Review

2.) 人工智能与同行评审

3.) Alternative Peer Review Models

3.) 替代同行评审模式

4.) The Ideal Future of Peer Review

4.) 同行评审的理想未来

Make sure to check it out!

一定要去看看！

Will go online as of Monday morning (25 Sept., 9 AM CEST)

将于周一上午（9 月 25 日，上午 9 点 CEST）上线

 

Celebrating Peer Review Week with Prophy Insights!

庆祝同行评审周——Prophy 洞察！

As we dive into #PeerReviewWeek, we wanted to shed light on the evolving landscape of academic publishing. Our latest infographic, derived from extensive Prophy data, offers an intriguing snapshot

在#同行评审周，我们想展示学术出版领域不断变化的格局。我们最新的信息图，基于广泛的 Prophy 数据，提供了一个引人入胜的概览

 

PRW 2023: “Peer Review and The Future of Publishing”

PRW 2023: “同行评审与出版的未来”

The importance of peer review to the quality and overall success of a journal can’t be overstated. For a journal to be recognized in the academic or medical community as legitimate, a robust peer review system must be in place. In recent years, the scholarly community has been shown time and again the results of substandard (or nonexistent) peer review. It has also become clear that identifying an effective and efficient model of peer review has proven to be a challenge for publishers.

学术界和医学界普遍认为，同行评审对期刊的质量和整体成功至关重要。为了使期刊在学术或医学社区中被认可为合法的，必须有健全的同行评审系统。近年来，学术界一再展示了低质量（或不存在）同行评审的后果。同时，出版商也发现确定一种有效且高效的同行评审模式颇具挑战性。

 

Peer Review and the Future of Publishing: Insights from Scholarly Journal Editors

同行评审与出版的未来：学术期刊编辑的见解

KGL Editorial recently interviewed five scholarly journal editors and publishing experts on the unique aspects they consider in their peer review process. These publishing professionals generously shared their experiences in the spirit of Peer Review Week, which both inspires innovation and new initiatives and evokes camaraderie in their common challenges. All five individuals shared at least one unique aspect of their peer review model with us.

KGL Editorial 最近采访了五位学术期刊编辑和出版专家，探讨他们在同行评审过程中考虑的独特方面。这些出版专业人士慷慨地在同行评审周的精神下分享了他们的经验，这既激发了创新和新的举措，也唤起了他们共同挑战中的团结精神。这五位人士中的每一位都与我们分享了他们同行评审模式中至少一个独特方面。

 

Celebrating Peer Review Week

庆祝同行评审周

This is a special series of articles in celebration of Peer Review Week. Throughout this week, we’ll explore various aspects of the peer review process, from its fundamentals to emerging trends.

这是一系列特别的文章，庆祝同行评审周。在这周里，我们将探索同行评审过程的各个方面，从基础到新兴趋势。

 

PRISM & Peer Review Week: building trust in OA books through transparency of peer review procedures

PRISM & 同行评审周：通过同行评审流程的透明性建立 OA 图书的信任

DOAB has a Peer Review Information Service for Monographs (PRISM) and in this blog post we explain to publishers (and the public) how it works and how they can participate in the service.

DOAB 有一个专著同行评审信息服务平台（PRISM），在这篇博客中，我们将向出版商（以及公众）解释该服务如何运作以及他们如何参与其中。

 

How does mandated code-sharing change peer review? An interview with Feilim Mac Gabhann, Jason Papin, and Virginia Pitzer

强制代码共享如何改变同行评审？与费利姆·麦加邦、杰森·帕宾和维吉尼亚·皮茨的访谈

On March 31 2021, PLOS Computational Biology introduced a new journal requirement: mandated code sharing. If the research process included the creation of custom code, the authors were required to make it available during the peer review assessment, and to make it public upon the publication of their research article—similar to the longstanding data sharing requirement for all PLOS journals. The aim, of course, is to improve reproducibility and increase understanding of research.

2021 年 3 月 31 日，PLOS Computational Biology 引入了一项新的期刊要求：强制代码共享。如果研究过程中创建了自定义代码，作者在同行评审评估期间需要将其提供出来，并在发表研究文章时将其公开——类似于 PLOS 所有期刊长期存在的数据共享要求。当然，目标是提高可重复性并增加对研究的理解。

 

The Next Iteration of Peer Review: Key developments you need to know

下一次同行评审的迭代：你需要了解的关键发展

What will the next iteration of scholarly journal peer review look like? That’s the question team Scholastica is pondering this Peer Review Week. Here are the primary issues and innovation areas we’re tracking with high-level breakdowns of the latest updates.

下一个学术期刊同行评审会是什么样子？Scholastica 团队在 Peer Review 周期间正在思考这个问题。以下是我们在密切关注的主要问题和创新领域，附有最新更新的高级概述。

 

Co-Founder Perspectives: Future-proofing peer review systems

联合创始人视角：为学术同行评审系统未雨绸缪

This year’s Peer Review Week theme got Scholastica’s co-founders thinking about how we’re working to future-proof our peer review software and support efforts to future-proof the complex and growing ecosystem of scholarly communication tools and technologies more broadly. Here’s what they had to say.

今年的同行评审周主题让 Scholastica 的联合创始人思考了我们如何在同行评审软件方面进行未雨绸缪，并支持更广泛地为复杂的学术交流工具和技术生态系统未雨绸缪。以下是他们的观点。

 

What Do Non-Scientists Need to Understand about Peer Review?

非科学家需要了解哪些关于同行评审的内容？

Understanding the role of peer review in science is vital not only for scientists themselves, but also for all of us who live in a society that relies on scientific research. In this Peer Review Week post, AMS Editor’s Award winners discuss what non-researchers need to understand about peer review.

了解同行评审在科学中的作用不仅对科学家本身至关重要，对我们所有依赖科学研究的社会成员也同样重要。在本次 Peer Review Week 的帖子中，AMS 编辑奖得主讨论了非研究人员需要了解的关于同行评审的内容。

 

evolution in Peer review: exploring alternative models for enhanced academic publishing

同行评审的演变：探索增强学术出版的替代模式

The alternative peer review models deviate from the traditional peer review process, focusing on a broader range of perspectives, improving transparency, and adapting to the changing landscape of academic publishing. Meandering its way through the challenges, it ensures a more comprehensive and accurate evaluation of scholarly research. Ultimately, the overarching goal should be a collaborative effort to elevate the quality and impact of academic publications, recognizing that both traditional and alternative peer review approaches have their merits and areas for improvement.

替代同行评审模式偏离了传统的同行评审流程，侧重于更广泛的视角，提高透明度，并适应学术出版领域的变化。尽管面临挑战，它确保了对学术研究进行更为全面和准确的评估。最终，总体目标应该是共同努力提高学术出版的质量和影响力，认识到传统和替代同行评审方法各有优劣，都有改进的空间。

 

PLOS looks ahead to a future of cooperation and collaboration at all levels of scholarship and scholarly communications

PLOS 展望未来，在所有学术领域和学术交流层面的合作与协作

Peer Review Week 2023 will focus on Peer Review and the Future of Publishing. At PLOS, we envision a future in which researchers, institutions, and organizations collaborate fluidly across disciplines and distances. A future of team science, collaborative peer review, multidisciplinary research, and collaboration between researchers in different regions, institutions, and even with the public.

2023 年同行评审周将聚焦于同行评审与出版的未来。在 PLOS，我们设想一个未来，在这个未来中，研究人员、机构和组织能够在学科和地域的界限上灵活地进行合作。一个团队科学、协作同行评审、跨学科研究以及不同地区、不同机构甚至与公众之间的合作的未来。

 

Looking beyond publications for sharing and assessing research

超越出版物进行研究分享与评估

For peer review week 2023, MRC looks beyond publications to shine a spotlight on alternative ways to share and review research outputs.

为了 2023 年同行评审周，MRC 超越出版物，聚焦于分享和评估研究输出的替代方式。

 

Selecting the Right Reviewers for Your Peer Review: The Significance and the Challenge

选择合适的审稿人：意义与挑战

Peer review lies at the core of the scholarly publishing process, but how much do we really know about the process, it’s significance and the various challenges that researchers face in peer review? Are there efficient solutions to these challenges? Is technology going to help simplify peer review in the future of publishing? This blog delves into the peer review selection scenario as it stands today and reveals how technology can bring peer review into the future of publishing.

同行评审是学术出版过程的核心，但我们真正了解这个过程、它的意义以及研究人员在同行评审中面临的各种挑战有多少呢？有没有有效的解决方案来应对这些挑战？技术在未来出版中是否会帮助简化同行评审？本文探讨了当前的同行评审选择情况，并揭示了技术如何将同行评审带入出版的未来。

 

How do AI tools and Large Language models fit into the future of Peer Review?

AI 工具和大型语言模型如何融入同行评审的未来？

Reviewers, editors, and publishers have rightly been concerned about the potential misuse of technology to generate unreliable content in the literature that may pass filters of peer review. As we learn more about these technologies, how they change researcher behaviour, and how they affect publishing, we will continue to adapt our guidance and policies in this area to ensure we are meeting the needs of our communities.

审稿人、编辑和出版商有理由担心技术被滥用以生成不可靠的内容，这些内容可能通过同行评审的过滤。随着我们对这些技术的了解越来越多，它们如何改变研究行为以及如何影响出版，我们将继续调整我们在这一领域的指导和政策，以确保满足我们社区的需求。

 

7 Top Tips to Ensure your Submission Makes it to Peer Review

确保您的投稿进入同行评审的 7 条锦囊

Sage’s ever-evolving peer review processes are adapted to be robust and reflect the latest industry standards. We are committed to ensuring that authors feel confident and well-informed when submitting their manuscripts to our journals. We’ve therefore highlighted 7 helpful tips authors should keep in mind when submitting their manuscripts.

Sage 的同行评审流程不断进化，旨在变得更为 robust 并反映最新的行业标准。我们致力于确保作者在向我们的期刊提交稿件时感到自信和充分了解。因此，我们列出了作者在提交稿件时应牢记的 7 条实用建议。

 

Reimagining the future of peer review beyond operations

重塑未来同行评审的愿景

Beyond the doom and gloom of AI taking over peer review and the excitement of how this technology could transform scholarly publishing, this peer review week I take stock of how peer review could work in future, focusing on the smaller ripples in the industry that could (and perhaps should) become more commonplace and in future, the gold standard. While also considering the improvements we could make to how we do peer review and indeed, why we do it. The focus of this article is not to discuss the merits and demerits of each mode of peer review but to instead look beyond the operational possibilities of peer review and how these changes can benefit research communities.

超越 AI 接管同行评审的悲观情绪和这项技术如何可能重塑学术出版的兴奋之情，本次同行评审周，我盘点了未来同行评审可能的工作方式，重点关注那些可能（或许应该）变得更加普遍，并在未来成为标准的小规模变化。同时，我也考虑了我们如何改进同行评审以及我们为何进行同行评审本身。本文的重点不是讨论每种同行评审模式的优缺点，而是着眼于超越同行评审的操作可能性，并探讨这些变化如何惠及研究社区。

 

VIDEOS

视频

How Journals and Publishers Can Use AI in Peer Review: What Works and What Doesn’t?

期刊和出版社如何在同行评审中使用 AI：有效与无效的做法？

In this engaging video, Dr Marie Soulière explores how AI-based solutions can prevent or overcome some of the traditional challenges in peer review for journals and publishers, without compromising on accuracy and integrity. Drawing on her experience in developing an AI-powered peer review assistant for Frontiers, she provides real-life examples of how such tools can boost efficiency and productivity among journal staff, enabling them to focus on high-value, high-impact tasks.

在这一引人入胜的视频中，Dr. Marie Soulière 探讨了基于 AI 的解决方案如何在不牺牲准确性和完整性的情况下，预防或克服期刊和出版商在同行评审中的一些传统挑战。她以在《前沿》杂志开发 AI 驱动的同行评审助手的经验为例，提供了实际案例，说明这类工具如何提高期刊工作人员的效率和生产力，使他们能够专注于高价值、高影响力的任务。

 

Referee Finder: The Ultimate Guide

审稿人查找器：终极指南

We’ve meticulously crafted Prophy to cater to the needs of professionals in the scientific community. Whether you’re a publisher, researcher, or academic institution, our platform is engineered to streamline the manuscript evaluation process.

我们精心打造了 Prophy，以满足科学界专业人士的需求。无论是出版商、研究人员还是学术机构，我们的平台都旨在简化手稿评审流程。

 

Peer Review Week 2023: Unique Aspects of Peer Review Models

2023 同行评议周：同行评议模式的独特方面

For Peer Review Week, KGL interviewed journal editors and publishing experts on the state of peer review in 2023. In this first of four videos, you will hear from Tim Beardsley, Executive Editor, Endocrine Society; Jeremy Chapman, Editor in Chief, Transplantation and Transplantation Direct; Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr., Editor in Chief, Preventing Chronic Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Zara Manwaring, Managing Editor, Portland Press; and Sarah McCormack, Director of Scholarly Publications, American Society for Nutrition on unique aspects they consider in their peer review process.

在同行评审周，KGL 对期刊编辑和出版专家进行了采访，探讨了 2023 年的同行评审状况。在这一系列四段视频中的第一段，您将听到内分泌学会的执行编辑 Tim Beardsley；移植与移植直接杂志的主编 Jeremy Chapman；疾病预防控制中心的预防慢性病杂志主编 Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr.；Portland Press 的主编 Zara Manwaring；以及美国营养学会的学术出版总监 Sarah McCormack，他们将分享在同行评审过程中考虑的独特方面。

 

Peer Review Week 2023: Importance of a Diverse Editorial Board and Reviewer Pool

2023 同行评审周：多元化编辑团队和评审人库的重要性

For Peer Review Week, KGL interviewed journal editors and publishing experts on the state of peer review in 2023. In this second of four videos, you will hear from Tim Beardsley, Executive Editor, Endocrine Society; Jeremy Chapman, Editor in Chief, Transplantation and Transplantation Direct; Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr., Editor in Chief, Preventing Chronic Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Zara Manwaring, Managing Editor, Portland Press; and Sarah McCormack, Director of Scholarly Publications, American Society for Nutrition on innovations they have put in place to diversify editorial boards and reviewer pools.

为庆祝同行评审周，KGL 对期刊编辑和出版专家进行了采访，探讨了 2023 年的同行评审现状。在这一系列四段视频中的第二段，您将听到内分泌学会的执行编辑 Tim Beardsley；移植与移植直接杂志主编 Jeremy Chapman；疾病预防控制中心预防慢性病杂志主编 Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr.；Portland Press 的主编 Zara Manwaring；以及美国营养学会学术出版物总监 Sarah McCormack 关于他们为多元化编辑团队和评审人库所采取的创新措施。

 

Peer Review Week 2023: The Reviewers’ Experience

2023 年同行评审周：评审者的体验

For Peer Review Week, KGL interviewed journal editors and publishing experts on the state of peer review in 2023. In this third of four videos, you will hear from Tim Beardsley, Executive Editor, Endocrine Society; Jeremy Chapman, Editor in Chief, Transplantation and Transplantation Direct; Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr., Editor in Chief, Preventing Chronic Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Zara Manwaring, Managing Editor, Portland Press; and Sarah McCormack, Director of Scholarly Publications, American Society for Nutrition on their experiences incentivizing, training, and mentoring reviewers.

为庆祝同行评议周，KGL 对期刊编辑和出版专家进行了采访，探讨 2023 年的同行评议状况。在这一系列四段视频中的第三段，您将听到内分泌学会的执行编辑 Tim Beardsley；移植与移植直接杂志的主编 Jeremy Chapman；疾病预防控制中心的预防慢性病杂志主编 Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr.；Portland Press 的副主编 Zara Manwaring；以及美国营养学会的学术出版总监 Sarah McCormack 分享他们激励、培训和指导审稿人的经验。

 

Peer Review Week 2023: The Future of Peer Review

2023 年同行评审周：同行评审的未来

For Peer Review Week, KGL interviewed journal editors and publishing experts on the state of peer review in 2023. In this final of four videos, you will hear from Tim Beardsley, Executive Editor, Endocrine Society; Jeremy Chapman, Editor in Chief, Transplantation and Transplantation Direct; Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr., Editor in Chief, Preventing Chronic Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Zara Manwaring, Managing Editor, Portland Press; and Sarah McCormack, Director of Scholarly Publications, American Society for Nutrition on their hopes and ambitions for the future of peer review.

为纪念同行评审周，KGL 对期刊编辑和出版专家进行了采访，探讨了 2023 年同行评审的现状。在这一系列四段视频的最后一段中，您将听到内分泌学会的执行编辑 Tim Beardsley；移植与移植直接杂志的主编 Jeremy Chapman；疾病预防控制中心的预防慢性病杂志主编 Dr. Leonard Jack, Jr.；波特兰压片的主编 Zara Manwaring；以及美国营养学会的学术出版总监 Sarah McCormack，他们对同行评审未来的希望和抱负。

 

Recorded webinar – Addressing Reviewer Bugbears with Innovations in Peer Review

录制 webinar — 利用同行评审创新解决审稿人痛点

Leading up to Peer Review Week (September 25-29), Tim Gillett, Research Information’s consultant editor, hosted a webinar on behalf of IOP Publishing and Morressier.

在同行评审周（9 月 25-29 日）前夕，Research Information 的顾问编辑 Tim Gillett 代表 IOP Publishing 和 Morressier 举办了一场 webinar。

The webinar, titled ‘Addressing Reviewer Bugbears with Innovations in Peer Review,’ delved into the evolving landscape of peer review. The webinar centered around innovations in peer review, reviewer and publisher concerns, the potential impact of artificial intelligence on safeguarding the scholarly record, and more.

网络研讨会《以创新推动同行评审：解决审稿人的痛点》探讨了同行评审领域不断变化的格局。该网络研讨会围绕同行评审的创新、审稿人和出版商的关切、人工智能在保护学术记录方面的潜在影响等内容展开。

The event featured three speakers: Michelle North, a researcher and reviewer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Kim Eggleton, the head of peer review and research integrity at IOP Publishing. Barry Prendergast, the design operations manager at the technology company Morressier.

本次活动有三位演讲嘉宾：南非夸祖鲁纳塔尔大学的研究员和审稿人米歇尔·诺思；IOP 出版社的同行评审和研究诚信负责人金·伊格尔顿；Morressier 公司的设计运营经理巴里·普伦达斯特。

 

PODCASTS

播客

The Oxford Comment episode on the Future of Peer Review

牛津评论：关于同行评审未来的节目

25 September 2023

2023 年 9 月 25 日

Every year, Peer Review Week honors the contributions of scientists, academics, and researchers in all fields for the hours of work they put into peer reviewing manuscripts to ensure quality work is published. This year, the theme of Peer Review Week is “The Future of Peer Review.”

每年，同行评审周都会表彰来自各个领域的科学家、学者和研究人员为确保高质量论文发表而付出的辛勤工作。今年，同行评审周的主题是“同行评审的未来”。

On this episode of The Oxford Comment, we are excited to welcome three of our colleagues at Oxford University Press to discuss with us current changes they see in the field, and what they will mean for the future of publishing.

在这一期的《牛津评论》中，我们很高兴邀请到牛津大学出版社的三位同事，与我们讨论他们在领域内所观察到的当前变化，以及这些变化将如何影响出版业的未来。

 

APS Publications Podcast: Peer Review and the future of APS Publications

APS 出版社播客：同行评审与 APS 出版的未来

22 September 2023

2023 年 9 月 22 日

The American Physiological Society celebrates and discusses the theme of Peer Review Week 2023, which is Peer Review and the Future of Publishing. Peer Review Week is an annual global event which shines a spotlight on the role of peer review in scholarly publishing, and brings together individuals, institutions and organizations committed to sharing the central message that good peer review is critical to scholarly communication.

美国生理学会庆祝并讨论 2023 年同行评审周的主题——同行评审与出版的未来。同行评审周是一个年度全球活动，旨在突出同行评审在学术出版中的作用，并汇聚致力于分享优质同行评审对学术交流至关重要这一核心信息的个人、机构和组织。

 

Peer Review and the Future of APS Publications

同行评审与 APS 出版的未来

22 September 2023

2023 年 9 月 22 日

The American Physiological Society celebrates and discusses the theme of Peer Review Week 2023, which is Peer Review and the Future of Publishing. Peer Review Week is an annual global event which shines a spotlight on the role of peer review in scholarly publishing, and brings together individuals, institutions and organizations committed to sharing the central message that good peer review is critical to scholarly communication.

美国生理学会庆祝并讨论 2023 年同行评审周的主题——同行评审与出版的未来。同行评审周是一个年度全球活动，旨在突出同行评审在学术出版中的作用，并汇聚致力于分享优质同行评审对学术交流至关重要这一核心信息的个人、机构和组织。

 

Peer Review and the Future of Publishing

同行评审与出版的未来

In this video podcast from Nvcleus, by Amnet, we have two experts from the publishing ecosystem – Sven Fund and Martin Delahunty exploring the theme, ‘Peer Review and the Future of Publishing.’

在 Amnet 的 Nvcleus 视频播客中，两位出版生态系统专家 Sven Fund 和 Martin Delahunty 探讨了主题“同行评审与出版的未来”。

Sven Fund is an industry expert in publishing who discusses the critical role of peer review and why it often remains invisible in a world driven by researcher KPIs.

Sven Fund 是一位出版行业的专家，他讨论了同行评审在研究者 KPI 驱动的世界中所扮演的关键角色，以及为什么它往往处于隐形状态。

During the conversation, we’ll also dive into the world of AI-powered tools like ChatGPT and how they’re changing the future of publishing and peer review.

在对话中，我们还将探讨像 ChatGPT 这样的 AI 驱动工具如何改变出版和同行评审的未来。

Join us as we gain fresh insights, explore challenges, and discover the exciting possibilities that lie ahead in academic publishing.

加入我们，共同获得新的见解，探索挑战，并发现学术出版领域令人兴奋的可能性。

 

OTHER ONLINE PUBLICATIONS

其他在线出版物

Write up in the Electrochemical interface magazine

《电化学界面杂志》文章摘要

The Electrochemical Society will celebrate Peer Review Week 2023 by celebrating the amazing contributions of its 2022-2023 Peer Reviewers and thanking them for another year of their time, efforts, and commitment to the scholarly publishing community

The Electrochemical Society 将在 2023 年同行评审周庆祝其 2022-2023 年的同行评审员所做出的卓越贡献，并感谢他们又一年的时间、努力和对学术出版界的承诺

 

Social Media Post on the Topic, ‘Peer Review & its Significance’

关于“同行评审及其意义”的社交媒体帖子

26 September 2023

2023年9月26日

Peer review refers to the evaluation of scholarly work by experts in the same field. It is a rigorous process where these experts examine research papers, manuscripts, or conference papers for accuracy, originality, and validity. By doing so, they help improve the overall quality and reliability of scientific findings.

同行评审是指由同一领域的专家对学术作品进行评估。这是一个严谨的过程，这些专家会检查研究论文、手稿或会议论文的准确性、原创性和有效性。通过这种方式，他们有助于提高科学研究的整体质量和可靠性。

 

Social media post on the topic, ‘Peer Review steers our academic community towards excellence’

关于“同行评审引领我们的学术社区走向卓越”的社交媒体帖子

27 September 2023

2023 年 9 月 27 日

Participate in peer review or contribute your expertise to the scholarly community! Joining Editorial Boards: Many journals and conferences welcome experts to be part of their editorial boards. Collaborate in Conferences: Attend academic conferences to exchange ideas and offer feedback to fellow researchers. Peer Review Platforms: Consider signing up on platforms like Publons, where you can review articles and showcase your reviewing contributions.

参与同行评审或为学术界贡献你的专业知识！加入编辑委员会：许多期刊和会议欢迎专家加入他们的编辑委员会。参与学术会议：参加学术会议，交流想法，并为同行研究人员提供反馈。同行评审平台：考虑在 Publons 等平台上注册，你可以在那里审阅文章并展示你的评审贡献。

 

Infographic – The evolution of peer review

信息图 – 同行评审的演变

This infographic highlights the journey of the peer review process from traditional models to open and collaborative approaches.

该信息图展示了同行评审过程从传统模式到开放和协作方法的演变历程。

 

infographic – How Journals and Publishers Can Enhance Transparency in Peer Review

信息图——期刊和出版商如何提高同行评审的透明度

This handy infographic presents a concise guide to different ways in which journals and publishers can promote transparency in the peer review process, thereby generating trust among authors as well as increasing public trust in science.

这份实用的信息图提供了一种简洁的指南，说明期刊和出版商可以通过不同的方式促进同行评审过程的透明度，从而在作者和公众之间建立信任，并增加公众对科学的信任。

Published systematic review

系统综述已发表

I have recently published a systematic review that collates available evidence pertaining to proposals/grants peer review blinding models in biomedical sciences.

我最近发表了一篇系统综述，汇总了关于生物医药科学中同行评审盲审模型的相关证据。

 

Infographic – Revolutionizing the Peer Review Process– Demystifying the AI power

信息图 – 重塑同行评审流程——揭开 AI 的力量面纱

In the ever-evolving landscape of academic research, the revolution of the peer review process is through demystification of AI power. Human-AI hybrid peer-review can streamline the traditionally arduous and time-consuming peer review process. Semi-automation of manuscript evaluation can result in an improvised assessment of scholarly work.

在不断发展的学术研究领域，重塑同行评审流程是通过揭开 AI 的力量面纱实现的。人机结合的同行评审可以简化传统上既繁复又耗时的同行评审流程。半自动化的稿件评估可以对学术作品进行改进的评估。

 

checklist – Empowering Peer Reviewers: A roadmap for effective manuscript evaluation

评估指南 – 为同行评审赋能：有效稿件评估的路线图

We all know that peer review is an essential process in academic and scientific publishing. As peer reviewers, our responsibility is not just to identify flaws but also to recognize and encourage the strengths and contributions of the authors. Whether you are a seasoned expert or new to the role of a peer reviewer, this checklist serves as a structured tool to assess manuscripts across various disciplines and article types. By following this checklist and conducting a thorough peer review, you contribute to the advancement of knowledge, the refinement of research, and the maintenance of scholarly rigor.

我们都知道同行评审是学术和科学出版中的一个关键过程。作为同行评审者，我们的责任不仅是识别缺陷，还要识别和鼓励作者的优点和贡献。无论你是经验丰富的专家还是刚刚担任同行评审者的角色，这份检查表都可以作为评估不同学科和文章类型的结构化工具。通过遵循这份检查表并进行彻底的同行评审，你将为知识的进步、研究的完善以及学术严谨性的维护做出贡献。

 

OTHER ACTIVITIES

其他活动

text interview – Re-imagining peer review: Interview with Helen Buckley Woods  

In this interview with Helen Buckley Woods, we explore the innovations in peer review that have occurred in the recent past and the different schools of thought that are advancing the work on improving the peer review process.

在对海伦·巴克利·伍兹的采访中，我们探讨了近期在同行评审方面出现的创新以及推动改进同行评审流程的不同学派观点。

 

Text Interview – Re-imagining peer review: Interview with Lilia Mantai

TEXT INTERVIEW – 重塑同行评审：与莉莉亚·曼泰伊的访谈

Peer review needs to be better recognized as a scholarly contribution. In this interview, we ask Lilia Mantai what role peer review plays in a researcher’s career progression, the ways in which researchers can better showcase their peer review work, and how recognition of peer review effort can be improved in the future.

同行评审需要被更好地视为学术贡献。在本次访谈中，我们询问了莉莉亚·曼泰伊，同行评审在研究人员的职业发展过程中扮演什么角色，研究人员可以如何更好地展示他们的同行评审工作，以及如何在未来更好地认可同行评审的努力。

 

text interview – The Exciting Role of AI in Peer Review

文本访谈——AI 在同行评审中的激动人心的角色

This in-depth interview explores the intersection of AI and manuscript evaluation, including how AI can complement human expertise. Nishchay also offers practical solutions to the typical challenges that a journal or publisher may encounter while integrating AI into the manuscript evaluation system.

本文深入探讨了 AI 与手稿评估的交叉领域，包括 AI 如何补充人类的专业知识。Nishchay 还提供了实用的解决方案，帮助期刊或出版商在将 AI 整合到手稿评估系统中时应对常见的挑战。

 

Join ACS Publications for Peer Review Week 2023!

加入 ACS 出版社 2023 同行评审周！

Discover the different ways you can participate in Peer Review Week 2023 with ACS Publications.

了解 ACS 出版社 2023 同行评审周的各种参与方式。

 

ScienceOpen’s Open Peer Review Competition

科学开放同行评审竞赛

To mark Peer Review Week coming up at the end of September, we invite scholars to a month-long celebration of open peer review and to begin exploring preprints on ScienceOpen, submit a substantial review, and compete for one of three prizes in our open peer review competition. To take part in this competition, you need to:

为纪念九月底即将举行的同行评审周，我们邀请学者们参加为期一个月的开放同行评审庆祝活动，并开始在 ScienceOpen 上探索预印本，提交一篇重要的同行评审，并参加我们开放同行评审竞赛，赢取其中一份奖品。要参加此次竞赛，您需要：

– Register for a free profile on ScienceOpen and connect your ORCID account.

- 在 ScienceOpen 上注册一个免费的个人资料，并连接您的 ORCID 账户。

– Learn more about open peer review by checking out all the resources of ASAPbio

- 通过查看 ASAPbio 的所有资源，了解更多关于开放同行评审的信息。

– Submit your open peer review by September 29th

- 在 9 月 29 日前提交您的开放同行评审。

– Get a chance to win a year’s subscription to scite.ai. We will hold a drawing at the end to select the three lucky winners from the authors of the reviews we receive. Once their reviews are published, all reviewers will be able to benefit from our context of over 88 million publications and continue the conversation in our network.

– 有机会赢取一年的 scite.ai 订阅。我们将从我们收到的评论作者中抽取三位幸运获奖者。一旦他们的评论发表，所有评论者都将能够利用超过 880 万篇出版物的上下文，并在我们的网络中继续讨论。

 

来源：https://archive.peerreviewweek.net/?page_id=2004